InterDrone Newswire

Mar 25, 2015 10:12:48 AM

Precision Hawk, a manufacturer of UAVs and cloud-based software to collect, manage and analyze aerial data across civilian applications, today announced that they will join the NASA collaboration to build a traffic management system for drones. In January, PrecisionHawk launched the working prototype for a 'Low Altitude Tracking and Avoidance System', otherwise known as LATAS, to serve as a solution for the safe integration of drones into the National Airspace. By bringing this operational tracking system to the conversation, PrecisionHawk will have the ability to outfit every UAV platform, commercial or hobbyist, with the technology to send real time flight data transmission based on world-wide cellular networks.

"To provide a scalable means for drones to be integrated into an overall UTM system, you need a hardware solution that will work on a platform regardless of size or weight," said Tyler Collins, PrecisionHawk's Director of Business Development and creator of LATAS. "Currently, manufacturers that are working to integrate their specific systems in a UTM are leaving out a huge network of drone users, including the hobbyist unmanned vehicles, which comprise the majority of the space."

PrecisionHawk and NASA, along with their other partners, will work together to test, on a broader scale, a wide range of UAVs in real-world scenarios. As NASA continues to develop a workable UTM, LATAS will have the potential to serve as the hardware addition for each drone attached to that overarching system. LATAS is small (3x2x1in), light (100G) and operational on networks speeds as low as 2G.

"As NASA continues to add features to this system, we will work closely to make sure the LATAS feature set compliments the landscape of the UTM," said Collins. "This relationship with NASA reinforces our mission to progress the commercial UAS landscape in the United States by utilizing safe and efficient solutions."

Related Search Term(s): Startups and Partnerships, Control Systems

Thoughts? Leave a comment: